Cold War and for its continuance to1956 Essay

How distant do you agree that ideological opposition amongst the super violencefulnesss was primarily responsible for both the origin of the insensate War and for its law of continuation to 1956?Certainly, the ideological rivalry that existed between the eastside and the West, concerning Communism and Capitalism was the largest factor to displace the lengthy inhuman war, plainly in that respect were different smaller factors that inflamed the remainder and ensured its continuance. Almost all of these factors can be drawn back to the fundamental hostile ideologies and most of which were answers against the others single policies, such as Comecome was the Soviet result to the Truman doctrine/ Marshall Aid, and the Warsaw cartel a reaction to the creation of NATO.As the Second World War came to an sup advertize in 1945 it became clear that pre-war revulsion for the single ideologies was ready to once again behind its ugly head. The war time knowledge between the US and the Soviet kernel had existed simply to unite against an enemy that if face up alone, neither could exact everyplacethrown. By 1945 it was obvious that Hitler and Nazi Germany were reaching the end of their tendinous and destructive lifetimetime. With the downslope of their enemy, the devil super mights had no common ground and were therefore left hand to return to their nations and their respective pre-war inter issuing policies. both(prenominal) Russian and American ideologies can exactly be fully understood or explained by looking at their individual roots. America, as it stands today was arrangeed less(prenominal) than two hundred age ago, with such a short national history and no legs to stand on, it is no wonder they be so scared of other ideologies, and affirm on enforcing their bogus democracy, liberty and freedom on other countries with no remuneration or acceptance of other ways of living.The basis of US foreign insurance since 1945 has been the idea of containment, sketched out by George Kennan in the Long Telegram of 1946. Kennan argued that the methods and goals of the US and the SU were conflicting and therefore the US should prepare for a long get by. At some item the illegitimate government of the SU would collapse from in spite of appearance and the struggle would be over, as or so perfect prophecy of what was to happen years later.During the late Middle Ages, Russia had been isolated from europium by Mongol occupation, once Russia gained its freedom from the Mongol yoke and try to become a European power, it found that it lacked the technology and culture of the West. Furthermore, it was an underdeveloped grump society, embracing enormous geographical expanse. The altercate was to change and modernize the country. Russian leadership from Ivan the Terrible onwards were all set about with the problem of transforming this backward society. In 1917, the reds transmittable these traditional Russian preoccupati ons how eer they overly inherited a desire to pin down themselves and pursue her own unique national calling rather than simply abide by in a Western praxis of development. The Soviet heart, Stalin declared, did not need the West, but could succeed on its own.Additionally, while the Bolsheviks embraced the bolshy vision of a universal designing of development, they excessively inherited Marxs ambivalent attitude to capitalism and his desire to adjoin its destruction. Suspicion of the West thus came to be robustly embedded in the Bolshevik mentality the West was the enemy against which sovietism defined its indistinguishability. It was therefore, essentially, a reactive identity Soviet socialism, constructed as a defy against Western capitalism, was an anti- institution to Capitalism (Kotkin 1995).Personality clashes between the two superpower leaders, Stalin and any of the US Presidents once again comes back to their completely opposing ideological beliefs and their indi vidual fears of the others possible world domination. So when Stalin died in 1953 it was unclear how, or regular if, Soviet politics could maintain its inflexible policies both internationally against America and internally. However, in 1956 Khrushchev, the new Soviet leader do his famous secret speech, clearly criticizing Stalin this, near nevertheless more clearly than stock-still Stalins death, signified the end of Stalinism. Khrushchevs appointment marked the end of the alliance between Stalin and the West. Brimming with positive ideas for pacifist(prenominal) co public, and a a lot larger power base than Stalins dictatorship ever allowed, the relationship between Khrushchev and the west began, and thats a whole other story.The bleak War was an ideological and geographical struggle between two opposing systems. every slur important, it was a struggle that took place during the number 1 fifty years of the thermonuclear age, and the existence of nuclear weapons greatl y affected the genius of the struggle. The black cloud of nuclear Armageddon hung over the entire dust-covered war period. Yet, thankfully, the misfire was never used to attack after 1945 by either the United States or the Soviet Union.Although this war was nothing want either the first or imprimatur world war, the rest of the world was dragged in too. The Korean War was label the stale war in the east by one historian. (sorry know this bit should be much much longer)At no point in history, from before the 16th century have two superpowers been able to coexist, there has always been a single hegemonic power. Yet Hollands entice in the 16th century and Portugals colonization of Spain and South America, and even the British Empire would never have been labeled superpowers. Perhaps this is because although these countries had influence, they did not have the power to get down the world at the press of a button. Nonetheless in this nuclear era there is even less room for two m ajor powers, and even though the ideologies are complete opposites, the cold war can be explained as a power struggle between two big kids, fighting for their remedy to be the biggest bully in the playground.Although this sure enough wasnt the first, or indeed the last, war that America has won I discover that this is almost the most important allure in US, indeed even world, history. The combat of two superpowers, both with the ability to destroy the world, and that lonesome(prenominal), by the collapse of the Soviet Union in the late 20th century, allowed the US to appear as the kick upstairsner and sham the position of the worlds tho superpower and subtly declare itself world leader. I believe the cold war is one of the largest factors for causing the American superiority which had the cold war had a different outcome perhaps would have been suppressed or even seen the Soviet Union develop the ignorance and superiority that is so fiercely disliked by much of the world.I fully agree that essentially the cold war was a resistance between the United States and the Soviet Union, fuelled on both sides by the belief that the ideology of the other side had to be destroyed. It is because of this that co-existence was not possible- one side could only win at the expense of the other, no matter how long either side had to time lag for their victory, the ideological hatred ran so deep that both sides that neither side was hustling to jeopardize their own way of life for the benefit of the other. The Soviet Union held to Lenins belief that conflict between communism and capitalism was inevitable.The United States believed that relaxation and stability in the world would only emerge when the evil of communism had been exorcised. At the ideological level Moscows communist world-view, which saw capitalism as absolute evil, fed off caps world-view, which saw communism as an absolute evil, and in this way helped to become the others prophecy. Every action t hat either power took was followed by an almost immediate reaction from the other, the continuation of the Cold War not only until 1956 but until the Soviet Unions downfall in 1970/80s, was continually fueled by actions and reactions which were sometimes insignificant but which also brought the world closer than ever to a full scale nuclear war.BibliographyStalinism, An Overview P. Boobbyer 2000The Cold War John W. MasonSarah Holtam scallywag 1 2/5/8/2007